Inter-City Products Corp. v. Willey
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HIGGINS, District Judge.
The Court has before it the defendants’ objections (filed May 27, 1993; Docket Entry No. 67) to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (entered May 14, 1993; Docket Entry No. 62) and defendants’ motion (filed May 27, 1993; Docket Entry No. 65) for de novo determination.. The Court has independently reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s findings, objections and considered the entire record de novo. The defendants’ objections are without merit and are overruled. The Magistrate Judge’s findings and conclusions are correct and they are adopted and approved.
Accordin…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Roche v. Young Bros., Inc., of FlorenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Long John Silver's, Inc. v. Diwa III, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
- Wills v. Hariohm PartnershipDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020