Legal Opinion

Rugg v. Smith

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1931No. 1770PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLemert, J.

At the very outset of this opinion it is well to note that F. Merle Rugg, mentioned in Item 3 of the will, is the- son of Sylvester Rugg, and Louise Smith and Emmaline Maginnis, mentioned in Item 5, are daughters of Sylvester Rugg.

As already stated, Items Three and Five are before" us for construction of the will of E. T. Rugg, and we deem it unnecessary to construe similar or like provisions in other wills that have heretofore been construed by the various courts in this and, other jurisdictions. The paramount mat-' ter to be considered in the construction of any will is the intention of the…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Lendecke's EstateWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  2. First Presbyterian Church v. TarrOhio Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. First Christian Church v. Stock Growers National Bank of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hartman v. OrrOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
  5. Reiss, Exr. v. PearsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API