Legal Opinion
City State Bank of Oklahoma City v. Stone
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 27, 1916No. 6625PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County: Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by G. B. Stone against the City State Bank of Oklahoma City. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
RUMMONS, C.
This action was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by an agreed controversy submitted for the determination of the court. The question in controversy arises upon the interpretation of the following provision of a contract between the plaintiff and defendant:
“We hereby guarantee to pay the 1911 taxes on same up to and including September 19, 1911; that is to say, that we are to pay the pro rata portion of same up to and including that date, and in the event we fail or refuse to pay these taxes we agree that G. B. Stone is authorized to pay same, and we will…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Buchanan v. State TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904
- Williams v. BagnelleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by4 opinions
- Appeal of Crescent Precision Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Board of Com'rs v. State Board of EqualizationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Opinion No. 75-169 (1975) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1975
- Vassar v. StraughnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942