International Ass'n of Machinists, Local Lodge No. 311 v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DANAHER, Circuit Judge.
Pursuant to our Rule 38 (k), 28 U.S. C.A. the parties stipulated the issue before us to be whether “the Board properly found that petitioners [the Union 1] engaged in conduct in violation of Section 8(b) (2) of the National Labor Relations Act as amended.”2 The Union contends that the record will not sustain the Board’s finding of illegality; the Board asks enforcement of its order as amended.3
If the Board’s amended order is to be sustained, it must be supported by a record which shows that the Union violated section 8(b) (2) of the Act by exerting economic pressure on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Drivers, Chauffeurs, Helpers, Local Union No. 639Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local 50, Bakery and Confectionery Workers International Union, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic Workers v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. International Association of MacHinists Lodge 942, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Joint Executive Board of Hotel & Restaurant EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- International Association Of Machinists, Local Lodge No. 311, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Local Joint Executive Board of HotelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962