Legal Opinion

Crust v. Knutrud

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00736-MWBUnknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW CRUST and TINA No. 4:19-CV-00736 EDELSTEIN, (Judge Brann) Plaintiffs, v. NILS D. KNUTRUD, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION SEPTEMBER 11, 2020 I. BACKGROUND After filing an answer and counterclaims over a year ago, Defendant Nils D. Knutrud has not shown any signs of participation in this litigation.1 Plaintiffs Matthew Crust and Tina Edelstein now move for summary judgment.2 Knutrud has not filed a brief in opposition or otherwise responded to Plaintiffs’ motion. Plaintiffs’ motion, accordingly, is now ripe for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. In Re Nickelodeon Consumer Privacy LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
  5. Fraser v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API