Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Broadwell

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 15, 1841PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the First District, Watts, J. urged that he was not a party to the surrender of the defendant, and therefore not hound by the proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtMorphy, J.

The plaintiff is appellant from a judgment dis*166charging a rule taken on Adams, Buckner & Co., to make them liable on a bail bond as the sureties of defendant, on a return of non est invenlus to a writ of capias ad satisfaciendum issued against the latter. The defence made below and renewed here, is, that shortly after the judgment obtained by plaintiff, his debtor made a cessio bonorum before the parish court, and obtained from that tribunal a stay of proceedings against his person and property; that a meeting of the creditors of said Broadwell was called, and as none of them appeared,…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Griswold v. WaddingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  2. The Julia, Luce, MasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  3. The Frances, Boyer, Master. ( Thompson and Al. .)Supreme Court of the United States · 1814

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API