Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Waltz
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 17, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Judge.
Wilbur Waltz appeals from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawan-na County that found him guilty of violating provisions of the Liquid Fuels and Fuels Tax Act (Act), Chapter 90 of the Vehicle Code, 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 9001-9022. Waltz appealed to the trial court from his conviction by a district justice. Specifically, the trial court found Waltz guilty of the summary offense of refusing to permit agents of the Department of Revenue (DOR) to inspect the fuel in the tank of his truck, parked in the driveway of his home, in violation of Section 9019(g) of the Act, 75 Pa.C.S. §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EbaughCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Warrington Township v. PowellCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. WaltzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2002