Legal Opinion

Warrington Township v. Powell

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge MIRARCHI, Jr.

Malcolm J. Powell and Margaret H. Powell, individually and d/b/a Malcolm’s Auto Body/Auto Repair and Malcolm’s Used Cars — Sales and Service (Appellants), acting pro se, appeal from the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Bucks County (trial court) that granted an injunction requested by Warrington Township (the Township) to conduct annual warrantless fire safety inspections of all buildings, structures, and areas located on Appellants’ business premises. We reverse in part and affirm in part.

On November 17, 1992, the Township’s Board of Supervisors…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. New York v. BurgerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grimm v. SweeneyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. In Re: $300,000 in U.S. Currency -- Appeal of: Z. XuCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
  3. State v. KlagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. KlagerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API