Legal Opinion

Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1999No. 20618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] State appealed from the trial court’s declaratory judgment ruling that Citibank was not required to pay six unmatched payments to State under South Dakota’s Uniform Unclaimed Property Act. Prior to oral argument on the appeal, State and Citibank agreed to settle the litigation and State moved to dismiss the appeal. State Treasurer Richard Butler then moved to intervene and we granted the motion. We now grant State’s motion to dismiss.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Citibank, N.A., a national banking association, is the United States’ largest issuer of Visa and Mastercard credit…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacqueline M. Harris, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor-Appellant v. Amoco Production Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Benavidez v. EuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  3. In Re Estate of TucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Safeway Insurance v. American Arbitration Ass'nAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Nevada Resort Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re B.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hickey Living TrustSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Mattaponi Indian Tribe v. Virginia Marine Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
  4. Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Citibank v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API