Legal Opinion

Carawan v. . Clark

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBabNHill, J.

No contention is made that plaintiff was, at the time of making of the contract, an adjudicated lunatic, and no rights of innocent parties are involved. Therefore, the question presented is this: Upon the facts found by the jury and admitted in the record, was defendant entitled to a judgment upon the verdict? We are of the opinion that the question should be answered in the negative.

A contract entered into by a person who is mentally incompetent is voidable and not void. Riggan v. Green, 80 N. C., 237; Creekmore v. Baxter, 121 N. C., 31; Brittain v. Mull, 99 N. C., 483; Ellington v.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sprinkle v. Wellborn.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. Odom v. . RiddickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  3. Ellington v. . EllingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Wadford v. . GilletteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Brittain v. . MullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. . CarlsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Chesson v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Walker v. . McLaurinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. Lawson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Dougherty v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API