Legal Opinion

United States v. Javier Valencia-Amezcua

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 2002No. 00-30365PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge.

Javier Valencia-Amezcua appeals his conviction for manufacturing more than 500 grams of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(l)(A)(viii). He challenges the denial of his pre-trial motions to suppress evidence and the admission of expert testimony at trial. He also claims that sufficient evidence did not exist to support his conviction and that his sentence should be reversed in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

I

On January 24,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Ybarra v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. United States v. Hosvaldo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Hart v. ParksCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. United States v. Tommy Owen HartzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  5. Walker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2004

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API