State v. Chabot
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The defendant, Michael Chabot, appeals from the revocation of his probation. Counsel for both parties came before us to show cause why this appeal should not be summarily decided. Having reviewed their arguments, we conclude that cause has not been shown and that we should proceed to decide the questions presented at this time. For the reasons set forth below, we sustain the defendant’s appeal.
On March 23, 1995, the state filed a report alleging that defendant had violated the terms of three previously imposed probationary sentences. 1 The violation was based upon charges that…
3Cases cited19 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. James David RossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by30 opinions
- State v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- State v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Hampton v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- State v. LaurenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.