Legal Opinion
In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Walton
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1984No. 6289Published
1Opinion of the Court
676 P.2d 1078 (1983)
In the Disciplinary Matter Involving Peter B. WALTON, Respondent-Attorney.
No. 6289.
Supreme Court of Alaska.
September 30, 1983.
As Amended January 3, 1984.
Robert H. Wagstaff, Wagstaff, Middleton & Pope, Anchorage, for respondent.
John R. Lohff, Lohff & Van Goor, Anchorage, for Alaska Bar Association.
Before BURKE, C.J., RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, and COMPTON, JJ., and CARPENETI,[*] Superior Court Judge.
OPINION
2Per curiam
This is a disciplinary matter involving attorney Peter B. Walton. Walton allegedly "created" a document, a copy of which he later attached, as an exhibit, to an unverified…
3Cases cited48 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.