Legal Opinion

Burks v. Neutzler

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1928No. Motion No. 8080; No. 1068-4776PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOritz, J.

This is a motion on the part of defendant in error to retax an item of $107, shown in the transcript from the district court under “bill of costs” as “court reporter’s fee for statement of facts, $107.”

Judgment in this ease was originally rendered in the district court for the defendant in error. Upon appeal to the Court of Civil Appeals, the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. 289 S. W. 436. Upon writ of error allowed by this court, judgments of the trial court and Court of Civil Appeals was reversed, and this cause rendered for the plaintiff in error. (Tex. 'Com. App.) 2 S.W.(2d) 416.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burks v. NeutzlerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  2. Pullman Co. v. Hays WifeTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Irving v. Fort Worth State BankTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  4. Burks v. NeutzlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. McGuire v. Osage Oil Corp.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API