Legal Opinion

Cenarrusa v. Peterson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1973No. 11130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

This action for a writ of mandate was instituted on November 3, 1971, by Pete T. Cenarrusa, Secretary of State, to require Harold E. Peterson, the County Clerk of Kootenai County, to mail out to “registered” electors in his county standard voter registration cards in conformity with the provisions of I.C. § 34-411 A. An Alternate Writ was issued and return made. On November 26, 1971, the trial court heard the cause, and after briefs were submitted, rendered its opinion, findings of fact and conclusions of law, and its order quashing the alternative writ of mandate.

Subsequent…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mills v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State Ex Rel. Stockton v. LeopoldIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Tryon v. BakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Johnston v. Kirkville Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
  5. State Ex Rel. Murchie v. BathIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Idaho Schools for Equal Educational Opportunity Ex Rel. Eikum v. Idaho State Board of Education Ex Rel. MossmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Idaho County Property Owners Ass'n v. Syringa General Hospital DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Robinson v. BodilyIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Idaho County Property Owners Ass'n v. Syringa General Hospital DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API