Legal Opinion

People v. Bridgehouse

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1956No. Crim. 5913PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Defendant, William Bridgehouse was convicted, after trial by jury, of second degree murder of William Bahr. His plea of not guilty by reason of insanity was tried, by stipulation, by the court and he was adjudged sane both presently, and at the time of the commission of the crime. The appeal is from the judgment of conviction and the denial of his motion for a new trial.

■ Defendant who was 31 years of age, married Marylou Bridgehouse in 1951. At the time of the crime, they had a son, Danny, who was 2½ years old. Mrs. Bridgehouse had a son by a prior marriage who, at the time of the crime, was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. ValentineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. People v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. People v. TubbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. People v. KelleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. BlakeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. People v. LaskoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. LuceroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API