Legal Opinion

Maryland Casualty Co. v. Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 3, 1947No. 15,784PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the Maryland Casualty Company, hereinafter referred to as the insurer, and the Hamilton & Gleason Company, hereinafter referred to as employer, are plaintiffs in error, and the Industrial Commission, hereinafter referred to as the commission, and Earl Anderson, hereinafter referred to as the claimant, are defendants in error.

The facts giving rise to this litigation are substantially as follows: In 1932 claimant was injured in an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment, as a result of which the commission found that he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
  2. John Thompson Grocery Stores Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  3. Tyler v. HagermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Cresson Consolidated Gold Mining & Milling Co. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  2. The People of the State of Colorado v. Benjamin WeeksSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  3. Lewis v. Scientific Supply Co., Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Dee Enterprises v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Arkin v. Industrial Commission of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API