Legal Opinion

Thorn v. Edgar Zinc Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 10, 1920No. 22,386PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

M. E. Thorn was injured while in the employ of the Edgar Zinc Company. He recovered a judgment against the company under the workmen’s compensation act, and it appeals.

A reversal is asked solely on the ground that the circumstances were such as to constitute a valid defense under the italicised words in the following extract from the statute:

“If it is proved that the injury to the workman results from his deliberate intention to cause such injury, or from his willful failure to use a guard or protection against accident required pursuant to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Bay Shore Laundry Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  3. General American Tank Car Corp. v. BorchardtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Messick v. McEntireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  5. Henschell v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cole v. List & Weatherly Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  2. Bersch v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  3. Carter v. Koch EngineeringCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API