Thorn v. Edgar Zinc Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdren, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Mason, J.:
M. E. Thorn was injured while in the employ of the Edgar Zinc Company. He recovered a judgment against the company under the workmen’s compensation act, and it appeals.
A reversal is asked solely on the ground that the circumstances were such as to constitute a valid defense under the italicised words in the following extract from the statute:
“If it is proved that the injury to the workman results from his deliberate intention to cause such injury, or from his willful failure to use a guard or protection against accident required pursuant to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wick v. GunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Bay Shore Laundry Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
- General American Tank Car Corp. v. BorchardtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Messick v. McEntireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
- Henschell v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cole v. List & Weatherly Const. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
- Bersch v. Morris & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Carter v. Koch EngineeringCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987