Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Bethenergy Mines, Inc.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 2000PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NEWMAN, Justice.

The issue presented in this appeal is whether Subsection 5(g) of the Bituminous Mine Subsidence and Land Conservation Act (Mine Subsidence Act), 52 P.S. § 1406.5(g),1 empowers the Environmental Hearing Board (Board) to award attorney’s fees and costs to a party that successfully defends an enforcement action of *1170the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). Because this Court finds that the Board has no such authority, we reverse the decision of the Commonwealth Court, which affirmed the Board’s award of $552,500.00 in attorney’s fees and costs to Bethenergy Mines,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Merlino v. Delaware CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  2. Big "B" Mining Co. v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. McDonald Land & Mining Co. v. Department of Environmental ResourcesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lucchino v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. In Re Nomination Petition of FarneseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Solebury Township v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API