Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Court

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDoerfler, J.

A vital, concrete proposition here pre-sénted is whether a bank, in discounting a note of one of its depositors and crediting the amount to the checking account of such depositor, becomes the bona fide owner of such note for value, where it appears from the'evidence'that on' the date of the discount the depositor added largely to his balance by additional deposits, but withdrew from his account, by checks actually paid; an amount sufficiently large so as to leave to 'his credit at the close of business on that day a sum considerably less than the amount' to his credit at the opening of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Henry v. SneedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Hodge v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Mann v. Second National BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
  4. Manufacturers' National Bank of Racine v. NewellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Market & Fulton National Bank v. SargentSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. New Jersey Title Guarantee & Trust Co. v. McGrathMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Wakem v. SchneiderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Union State Bank v. SavordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Rosenberg v. GilsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. First National Bank of Waukesha v. Motors Acceptance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API