Legal Opinion

Market & Fulton National Bank v. Sargent

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 16, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

On exceptions. The case appears in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitehouse, J.

This was an action on a promissory note for seven hundred and eighty-five dollars, brought by the plaintiff bank as indorsee of Earl B. Chace & Company against the defendant as maker of the note.

The defendant seasonably filed his affidavit that the paper declared on had been materially altered since it was executed.

The facts were not controverted. The defendant had signed a prior note for the accommodation of Chace & Company which was outstanding and overdue at the time of the signing of the note in question. At Chace’s request he agreed to sign three other accommodation notes to take up the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Angle v. North-Western Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hodge v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. First National Bank v. FlathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Merritt v. A. W. Boyden & SonIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Pierson v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1909
  5. Barrett v. GreenallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API