Hunt v. Nolen
Supreme Court of South Carolina
This case was argued at the November term, 1895, decided on the 24th day of March, 1896, and reported in this volume, page 356. After the filing of the opinion the respondents petitioned for a rehearing, upon ■ the grounds stated in the opinion.
1Per curiam
The respondents have filed a petition for a rehearing of this case upon certain grounds hereinafter considered.
1 I. The first of these grounds is: Because, it is submitted, the Court overlooked the fact, that while deed from plaintiffs to Nolen was executed on the 15th of July, 1889, the contract was, that Nolen was not to take possession until the 1st day of July, 1890, and that, therefore, the measure of damages would be the value of the 30J acres, with interest from 1st of January, 1890 — such date being the time of eviction — and not from the delivery of the deed. The first answer to this…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Collier v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- McMillan v. HughesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
- The Mobley Co. v. McLucasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1914
- Holden v. MelvinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
- Hogg v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.