Legal Opinion

Rosenoff v. Cross

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1917No. 13755PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Adams county, Linn, J., entered August 11, 1916, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for a writ of mandamus, after a trial on the merits to the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Ellis, C. J.—

-Action in mandamus to require the county

auditor of Adams county to issue to plaintiffs, who are druggists, a permit to ship into the state of Washington intoxicating liquors consigned to themselves. They claim the right under Rem. Code, § 6262-17. There is no dispute as to the facts. Plaintiffs are, and have for some years been, engaged in the drug business in Ritzville, Adams county, Washington. On June 6, 1914, they were both convicted in the superior court of Adams county and fined for a violation of the local option law, Rem. Code, § 6302, prohibiting the sale of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Hawker v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Washington v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
  4. Foster v. Bd. of Police Comm'rsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Fox v. Territory, Washington Territory1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. SutherbyWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. S. L. Rowland Construction Co. v. Beall PipeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Shorts v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. NOVA Contracting, Inc. v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2018

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API