Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Acme Granite & Tile Co. v. F. D. Rich Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 28, 1970No. Nos. 23744, 23745, 23752 and 23753PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALFRED T. GOODWIN, District Judge:
In an action by a subcontractor for damages against the prime contractor on an army housing project, the subcontractor appeals from a judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
The district court separated the issues of liability and damages. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff subcontractor on the issue of liability. The damages issues were then referred to a special master, who computed damages. The court modified the master’s findings and entered the challenged judgment in favor of the prime contractor notwithstanding the verdict in favor of the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bacon v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
- United States v. KoikeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Taylor v. Interstate Investment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Ted W. Brown, Secretary of State v. James I. KellerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Holmes v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1977
- R. J. Enstrom Corporation v. Interceptor Corporation and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
- Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Minton v. Ralston Purina Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Seattle Totems Hockey Club, Inc. v. National Hockey LeagueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.