Legal Opinion

Pullin v. Funderberg

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1961No. 13697PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

The trial court sustained a motion for summary judgment to plaintiff’s suit for trespass to try title and rendered judgment for defendants. Defendants, Beatrice P. Funderberg and Dan L. Funderberg, urge that the judgment should be affirmed because plaintiff, Varoma Pullin, failed to •comply with their demand to file an abstract, failed to make a showing of common source, and failed to raise a fact issue' about her superior title. In our opinion plaintiff did not fail in either of the stated •matters.

Defendants called on plaintiff to file an abstract. She prepared the abstract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Benn v. Security Realty & Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Stegall v. HuffTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Young v. FittsTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Richardson v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Patterson v. PeelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Geiser v. LawsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Byars v. ShipmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API