Legal Opinion

Coplay Cement Manufacturing Co. v. Loeb

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Glennon, J.:

The plaintiff, a corporation, seeks in this action to compel the defendants to account for their acts and conduct as directors and officers of the plaintiff in that, while in control of the affairs of the corporation, they were credited with and received certain sums of money as bonus payments, to which they were not entitled. Under the terms of a resolution adopted by the board of directors in the year 1917, and in substance readopted each year thereafter, up to and including the year 1920, the president, first vice-president, and second vice-president of the company were…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bosworth v. . AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Krumm v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. General Rubber Co. v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. Mayor, Etc., of N.Y. v. . SEC. Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  5. Wylde v. Northern Railroad Co. of New JerseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walker v. ManNew York Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API