Legal Opinion

Grigsby v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 18, 1975No. 2222-1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFarris, J.

John Milton Grigsby was a passenger in an automobile which collided with another in the last half of an unmarked S-curve. The Grigsby vehicle was in the wrong lane and met the other car head on. Grigsby claimed gross negligence against his driver and settled for $2,500 prior to the trial of his action against the City. In his action against the City, Grigsby alleged that he suffered severe permanent injury as a result of the negligent design, construction and maintenance of the street. A jury returned a defense verdict. He appeals from judgment entered on that verdict.

Grigsby assigns error to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Nordstrom v. White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. United States v. The State of Washington and Wenairco, Inc., a Corporation, the State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Malfait v. MalfaitWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Reid Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Bellevue PropertiesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Byerly v. MadsenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  2. Diaz v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Davidson v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  4. Hanson PLC v. National Union Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Weiland Ex Rel. Weiland v. VigilNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API