Legal Opinion

United States v. The State of Washington and Wenairco, Inc., a Corporation, the State of Washington v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 19, 1965No. 19907_1PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELY, Circuit Judge:

This action arose from the crash of an aircraft and the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq.

The plane, a light tandem type, was owned by Wenairco and at the time of the crash was occupied by the pilot, Sam Violett, a bailee, and Martin Braun, his passenger. The men were then engaged in civil defense practice for the State of Washington, and both were killed. The State fulfilled its obligation for payment of compensation benefits to the survivors of its employees and then sought, by action against the United States, to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  3. United Air Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. United States v. Thomas O. Hunsucker and Eva Newman HunsuckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Hernandez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Johnson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. Sterling v. BloomIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Aslakson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API