Legal Opinion
In Re Nadler
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 4, 1990No. 19-01028PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JAMES F. QUEENAN, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
The Debtors, Harold E. Rubin (“Rubin”) and Marvin J. Nadler (“Nadler”), seek to exclude from their bankruptcy estates their benefits under the pension plan of Halmar Distributors, Inc. (“Halmar”). Alternatively, if the benefits are included in the estates in the first instance, the Debtors contend that they are entirely exempt as “reasonably necessary ... for support” within the meaning of § 522(d)(10)(E) of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(10)(E) (1982). The Debtors’ largest creditor, ORIX Credit Alliance, Inc., moves for inclusion of the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Louisiana Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. FCCSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Segal v. RochelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re DemonicaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Raymond Lione Morter, AKA D/B/A Swinengineering, Inc., Debtor-Appellant v. Farm Credit ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- In Re CasonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
- In Re Churchill Properties III, Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
- In Re BarnesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.