Legal Opinion
Gingles v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided November 15, 2022No. 2:22-cv-11530Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ACKLIN GINGLES, Plaintiff, Case No. 22-cv-11530 v. Hon. Matthew F. Leitman UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________________________________________/ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISSOLVE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF No. 3) AND DENYING GLORIA SMITH’S MOTION TO INTERVENE (ECF No. 11) AS MOOT The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) holds a reverse mortgage on real property that Plaintiff Acklin…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. Robert W. Ritchie, Personally and in His Capacity as a Partner/officer of Ritchie, Fels & Dillard, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Loren v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Selden Apartments v. United States Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.