Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1988No. WCB 84-11354; CA A38534Published

1DissentWarren, J.

I agree with the majority that the award contemplated and compensated claimant for future periods of disability. However, I do not understand the Supreme Court’s opinion to hold that, whenever a claimant experiences time loss or becomes an inpatient in a hospital, he has established an aggravation, and I therefore dissent.

The Supreme Court posed the question as whether an award which contemplates future flareups will preclude an additional award under ORS 656.273 “for such flareups even if they produce greater disability than that for which the original award was made.” Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Gwynn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API