Legal Opinion
Giladov v. Kurzweil
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 10, 1995PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff Gilad Giladov appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Held, J.), entered April 18, 1994, which, upon a jury verdict finding that the defendant was 90% at fault in the happening of the accident and finding that the plaintiff Gilad Giladov had suffered damages in the principal sum of $60,000 for past pain and suffering and loss of the enjoyment of the pleasures of life, is in his favor in the principal sum of only $54,000.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gallo v. Supermarkets General Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Pallotta v. West Bend Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Rivera v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Gentile v. Terrace Heights HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Lopez v. Lindel General HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by7 opinions
- Klos v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Trainer v. Camp Hadar HatorahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- O'Brien v. BarrettaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Arevalo v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Falzon v. JPMorgan Chase & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.