Legal Opinion

First Nationnal Bank v. Cumbler

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1941No. Appeals, 29-32PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Stadtfeld, J.,

Opinion by

These are appeals from orders of the Court of Common Pleas in Dauphin County discharging rules to show cause' why four revived judgments entered by confession upon separate judgment notes should not be opened.

In February and March, 1932, the defendant, M. B. Cumbler, executed and delivered to the plaintiff, First National Bank of Mount Holly Springs, Pennsylvania, four judgment exemption notes, of which three were marked “renewal”. By virtue of the powers of attorney contained in each of the several notes, plaintiff confessed judgment on each note on November 15, 1932.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Aliquippa National Bank v. HarveySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. United States Savings and Trust Co. v. HelselSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Bernatovich v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. D'Ancona-MaherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lloyd v. JacobySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API