Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Missouri v. Portland Cement Ass'n

United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation

Decided February 28, 1979No. 296Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

2Per curiam

The Panel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, previously transferred an action from the Central District of California to the District of Arizona for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings with several actions pending there. In re Cement and Concrete ■ Antitrust Litigation, 437 F.Supp. 750 (Jud. Pan.Mult.Lit.1977). Twenty-eight actions in this docket are presently pending in the transferee district. Plaintiffs in the actions in the transferee district include a variety of purchasers of cement and cement products, including ready-mix concrete. Representation of several…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Commonwealth Oil/Tesoro Petroleum Securities LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  2. In Re Cement and Concrete Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
  3. In Re Hawaiian Hotel Room Rate Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1977
  4. In Re Airport Car Rental Antitrust LitigationUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978
  5. In re Sinking of the Motor Vessel UkolaUnited States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API