Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Kerzer, 99-4098 (2000)

Superior Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 10, 2000No. C.A. No. PC1999-4098Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

The plaintiffs have filed timely, albeit non-denominated, Rule 12(f) motions to strike each of the defendants' thirteenth affirmative defenses as "insufficient." By their thirteenth affirmative defenses, each defendant "relies upon all benefits, rights and protection pursuant to Section 9-19-34.1 of the Rhode Island General Laws, the so-called Collateral Source Rule." The plaintiffs argue that this section violates their rights to equal protection under both the United States and Rhode Island constitutions and is thus unconstitutional.1

The Attorney General, after notification,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. DiPetrillo v. Dow Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  2. Boucher v. SayeedSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Reid v. WilliamsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Votolato v. MerandiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  5. RHODE ISLAND INSURERS'INSOLVENCY FUND v. Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API