Legal Opinion

Bannister v. United States Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 25, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-1397Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _________________________________________ ) MARKIST BANNISTER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 18-cv-01397 (APM) ) UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _________________________________________ ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Defendant United States Parole Commission has denied parole multiple times to Plaintiff Markist Bannister, a federal prisoner who suffers from severe paranoid schizophrenia. The most recent denial of parole occurred in 2017. Plaintiff alleges that, for years, the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Wilkinson v. DotsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API