Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burrows v. Board of Assessors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 29, 1983Published

1Dissent

Levine, J. (dissenting).

As the majority notes, the differing classifications of veterans in this tax statute are to be tested under the most minimal of equal protection standards. In the context of both the history of assessment practices in this State and their effect on veterans’ exemptions, and of the political ramifications of the decision in Matter of Hellerstein v Assessor of Town of lslip (37 NY2d 1), a rational justification may be found for the classifications involved here sufficient to uphold the statute.

Prior to Hellerstein (supra), the prevailing practice among local taxing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hellerstein v. Assessor of IslipNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. C. H. O. B. Associates, Inc. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  4. In re the Estate of DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. C. H. O. B. Associates, Inc. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API