Legal Opinion

State v. Bethea

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 12, 1968No. 272-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant’s only assignment of error is that the sentences prescribed constituted “excessive, cruel and unreasonable punishment.” This assignment cannot be sustained. The sentences were below the statutory maximum for the offenses to which defendant pled guilty. They therefore cannot be cruel and unusual in the constitutional sense. State v. Robinson, 271 N.C. 448, 156 S.E. 2d 854. In Case No. 50-358, however, error appears upon the face of the record.

By written waiver, signed by a defendant and his counsel, the defendant may waive the finding of a bill of indictment in noncapital felony…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. PowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. State v. GloverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. SnipesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. TiradoSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API