Raab v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
*641D. ARTHUR KELSEY, Judge.
The trial court convicted George Edward Raab of driving under the influence, his third or subsequent offense, in violation of Code § 18.2-266. See also Code § 18.2-270 (codifying recidivism penalty). On appeal, Raab contends the evidence of his guilt should have been suppressed because the arresting officer had no legal basis to detain him in the first place. The trial court disagreed, as do we.
I
Under settled principles, we address the legal issues arising from a suppression motion “only after the relevant historical facts have been established.” Logan v. Commonwealth,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Raab v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Commonwealth v. StewartFairfax County Circuit Court · 2015
- Raab v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
- Raab v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007