Legal Opinion
Raab v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
Decided October 30, 2007No. 0972061PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KELSEY, Judge.
The trial court convicted George Edward Raab of driving under the influence, his third or subsequent offense, in violation of Code § 18.2-266. See also Code § 18.2-270. On appeal, Raab claims the evidence obtained by the arresting officer should have been suppressed because the officer had no legal basis to detain him. After a panel of this Court rejected this argument in Raab v. Commonwealth, 49 Va.App. 638, 644 S.E.2d 78 (2007), Raab asked us to reconsider the matter en banc. Having agreed to do so, we now affirm Raab’s conviction.
I
Under settled principles, we address the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Jones v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
- Joyce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2010
- Morris v. City of Virginia BeachCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011
- Najee Finique Hairston v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2017
- Jerry Lee Washington v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2012
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.