Smoldt v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
The issue in this case is whether the existence of a collective bargaining agreement (CBA), standing alone, prevents an employee subject to that agreement from pursuing a claim for wages in excess of those specified in the CBA. Employee, Richard Smoldt, had an individual employment contract with employer, Henkels & McCoy, Inc. A CBA also covered employee’s position. The wage rate provided by the individual contract was higher than the rate provided by the CBA. When employer paid wages according to the lower rate provided by the CBA, employee sought recovery from employer through a statutory…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Livadas v. BradshawSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. SnyderOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- Cramblit v. Diamond B ConstructorsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Cooper v. Applied Integrated Techs., Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Eric Cooper v. Applied Integ. Techs., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Krohn v. Hood River School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012