Legal Opinion

Russell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 13, 1991No. 2-90-012-CRPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERS, Justice.

Appellant, Herbert Gray Russell, appeals from a conviction by the jury of aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon. See TEX.PENAL CODE ANN. § 29.03 (Vernon Supp.1991). Punishment was assessed by the jury at twelve years confinement in the Texas Department of Corrections. 1

We affirm.

Appellant brings the five following points of error on this appeal: (1) the trial court erred in refusing appellant’s requested charge on the lesser-included offense of robbery by threats because a knife is not a deadly weapon per se; (2) the trial court’s refusal of appellant’s requested…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Wicker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Osbaldo Esparza-GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Wingfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  3. State v. PaleoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Clifton Earl Curtis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  5. David Wayne Black v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API