Legal Opinion

People v. Jefferson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Condon, J.), imposed August 22, 2011, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, including the defendant’s “ ‘age, experience and background’ ” (People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264 [2011] [emphasis omitted], quoting People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 11 [1989]), the defendant validly waived his right to appeal (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 254-255 [2006]; People v Panlall, 4 AD3d 540, 541 [2004]; cf. People v…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. People v. SeabergNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. BradshawNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. People v. PanlallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. AyalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API