Products Engineering Co. v. OKC Corp.
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ARCENEAUX, District Judge.
OPINION
This matter came before the Court on motions to dismiss filed on behalf of defendants OKC Limited Partnership (“Partnership”) and Cloyce K. Box (“Box”) in the second of these consolidated matters. After the Court requested supplemental memoranda, the parties waived oral argument and the matter was taken under submission. Having thoroughly reviewed the memoranda of counsel and the law, Civil Action No. 82-2568 is DISMISSED for reasons set forth hereinafter.
The operative facts in this matter are all undisputed as set forth in the documents attached to the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Louis JOHNSON, Appellant, v. BOYD-RICHARDSON CO., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- In Re Citadel Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1980
- Harris L. Kimball v. The Florida BarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Armour & Co. of Delaware v. BF Bailey, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Judy Ripalda v. American Operations CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. RedwineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Illinois Central Gulf Railroad v. Arbox Three Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988
- Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Charles RedwineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985