Boyer v. Pahvant Mercantile & Investment Co.
Utah Supreme Court
1DissentStraup, J.
The statutes which I think are material to the controversy are section 1579 of chapter 10, title 20; section 4875 of chapter 2; and sections 4900 and 4901 of chapter 4, title 93, Comp. Laws Utah 1917.
Section 1579 provides:
“Every recorder must keep:
“2. An ‘entry book,’ in which he shall immediately upon receipt of any instrument to be recorded * * * enter in the order of its reception or entry, as the case may be, the names of the parties thereto, its date, the day of the month, the hour, and the year of filing any such statement or marginal entry, and a brief description of the premises” and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Sinclair v. GunzenhauserIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Pringle v. DunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Prouty v. MarshallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Cady v. PurserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Ritchie v. MetcalfeWashington Supreme Court · 1890
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.