Hillcrest Investment Co. v. Utah Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McHUGH, Presiding Judge:
T1 Plaintiff Hillerest Investment Company, LLC (Hillerest]) appeals from the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT). The district court concluded that Hillerest does not have standing to pursue its claims against UDOT and that even if Hill-crest does have standing, it cannot prevail as a matter of law on its breach of contract and unjust enrichment claims. 1 We reverse the summary judgment and remand for further proceedings to resolve the factual questions relating to Hillerest's standing.
BACKGROUND 2
1 2…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Orvis v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Mullaney v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Higgins v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- Jenkins v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hillcrest Investment Co. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015
- In re Estate of D.A. OsguthorpeUtah Supreme Court · 2021
- Wm. Douglas Horne Family Revocable Trust v. Wardley/McLachlan Development, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Nolin v. S & S Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Metropolitan Water District of Salt Lake & Sandy v. Questar Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2015