Legal Opinion

United States v. Shoemaker

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois

Decided June 15, 1840PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT. At the last term the defendant [Andrew Shoemaker] was indicted for feloniously taking letters from the mail, he having possession of it as carrier, which contained bank notes, &c. The jury were impanneled, and witnesses sworn, when the prosecuting attorney abandoned the prosecution, and entered a nolle prosequi on the indictment.

Two points are raised for consideration and decision in this case: First. Had the prosecuting attorney a right to enter a nolle prosequi in this case? Second. Does such an abandonment amount to an acquittal of the defendant? There can be no doubt…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1837

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Cornero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
  3. Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  4. Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Cornish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API