United States v. Shoemaker
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT. At the last term the defendant [Andrew Shoemaker] was indicted for feloniously taking letters from the mail, he having possession of it as carrier, which contained bank notes, &c. The jury were impanneled, and witnesses sworn, when the prosecuting attorney abandoned the prosecution, and entered a nolle prosequi on the indictment.
Two points are raised for consideration and decision in this case: First. Had the prosecuting attorney a right to enter a nolle prosequi in this case? Second. Does such an abandonment amount to an acquittal of the defendant? There can be no doubt…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1837
3Cited by36 opinions
- Downum v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Cornero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- Hawes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Cornish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.