(PS) Garcia v. Procter and Gamble Company

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRIAN GARCIA, No. 2:17-cv-2591-JAM-EFB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY, 15 Defendant. 16 17 The court previously granted plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis, but 18 dismissed his original complaint with leave to amend pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).1 After 19 receiving an extension of time, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. ECF No. 7. As 20 discussed below, plaintiff’s first amended complaint states potentially cognizable discrimination 21 and…