Legal Opinion

Rowen v. Rowen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1998No. S-7311PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

Robert Jay Rowen appeals from superior court orders modifying his child support, refusing to exercise jurisdiction over a daughter residing in California, and awarding partial attorney’s fees incurred by his former wifé, Sandra Kaler Rowen, in enforcing the parties’ custody agreement. We affirm all of the disputed orders except one requiring Robert to pay all transportation costs for visitation.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. The Original Child Custody and Support Agreement

Robert Jay Rowen (Robert) and Sandra Kaler Rowen (Sandra) were married in 1976 and divorced in 1984.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brooks v. BrooksAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Richmond v. RichmondAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Nelson v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Coghill v. CoghillAlaska Supreme Court · 1992

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. J.L.P. v. V.L.A.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Mendel-Gleason v. HarrisAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Duffus v. DuffusAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kelly v. JosephAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Martin v. MartinAlaska Supreme Court · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API