Kollaritsch v. Mich. State Univ. Bd. of Trs.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
Paul L. Maloney, United States District Judge
Defendant Michigan State University requests the Court issue a certificate of appealability for an interlocutory appeal. (ECF No. 70.) For the following reasons, Defendant's motion is GRANTED.
Plaintiffs are four former students at Michigan State University (MSU). Each alleges that she was sexually harassed or assaulted by another student and reported the incident to MSU. Not satisfied with the manner in which the assaults were investigated and resolved, Plaintiffs filed this Title IX lawsuit. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. This Court granted…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Davis Ex Rel. LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Tiffany Williams v. Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Herbert Milbert v. Bison Laboratories, Inc., and the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- In Re City of Memphis, West Tennessee Chapter of Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc. Zellner Construction Company, Inc. v. City of MemphisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Doe 1 v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019